Nanostars

Vanadium Nanostars

It’s taken me a long time (over 2 years) to go public with my positive account of using nanoparticle (or angstrom-sized) minerals. This is because nanotechnology is experimental and the full ramifications of any application of the technology are yet unknown. Hence, I didn’t want to unduly influence anyone one way or the other, but I do feel it’s important to share the results of my personal experimentation and also encourage you to do your own research to make informed decisions.

What is Nanotechnology & Nanoparticles?

Nanotechnology is the experimental process of manipulating matter on an incredibly minute scale (one thousandth of a millimeter and smaller), in order to create new products and materials, or delivery systems. It is the creation and manipulation of tiny objects at the level of molecules and atoms. At the nano-scale, the laws of chemistry and physics work differently and materials develop unique properties not seen at normal particle size. Opaque materials, such as copper and zinc, become transparent; stable materials, such as aluminum become explosive; and solids such as gold turn into liquids.

There are two types of nanoparticles:

Fine particle – 100 – 2500 nanometers (nm)

Ultrafine – 1 – 100 nm

Angstrom (so named for physicist Anders Jonas Ångström) size is: .10 nm

So 1 Angstrom = 100 picometers = .10 nanometers

To put 100 nm in context: a strand of DNA is 2.5 nm wide, a protein molecule is 5 nm, a red blood cell 7,000 nm and a human hair is 80,000 nm wide.

New consumer products with hidden nanotech ingredients hit the US market in a nearly unregulated fashion each week, including baby toys, personal care products, clothes and countless other products. The nanoparticles in these products are so small, they are rapidly absorbed through the skin and spread to the environment in unpredictable ways.

Scientists are applying nanotechnology to a wide range of industries, including food, food packaging, kitchenware, personal care, medicine, electronics, clothing, sports equipment, fertilizers and pesticides. There are more than 800 consumer products on the market now using nanotechnology.

Examples of Nanotech Products

For example, a tableware set contains a nano silver coating that kills bacteria, aiming to prevent food-borne diseases. A toothpaste contains nanoparticles that help remove plaque and provide minerals to protect against tooth decay. A golf club shaft is made from “nano composite technology” to be stronger and lighter weight. This technology could also be used to make chemical and biological weapons.

In food, proponents say nanotechnology can boost and target nutrition, extend shelf life, improve taste and texture and detect bacterial contamination. There are now up to 300 nano food and 400-500 nano food packaging applications on store shelves.

Toddler Health is a nutritional supplement containing nano ion particles that claim to offer toddlers increased bioavailability.

Canola Active cooking oil contains NutraLease, a nutraceutical technology that uses nanocapsules to enhance the delivery of nutrients.

A preservative known as AquaNova contains nano-capsules of water-insoluble substances to increase  absorption in the body.

McDonalds burger packages contain nano-spheres that require less water and less time and energy to dry.

Miller Beer bottles are made from imperm,  a plastic imbued with clay nanoparticles that are as hard as glass but stronger and provide longer shelf life.

Major food companies such as General Mills, Kraft, Nestle, PepsiCo, Cadbury-Schweppes and Uniliver are researching and developing nano food and food packaging applications, building what is expected to be a $6 billion market this year.

There are nano agricultural applications. Syngenta developed a plant growth treatment – PrimoMaxx nano emulsion.

Cornell scientists developed a cloth with saturated nano fibers that slowly releases pesticides and herbicides when it is planted with seed. (Yikes!)

Health Risks

Like genetically modified foods, products of nanotechnology pose unknown risks to human health and the environment. Nanoparticles are more chemically reactive than larger particles. Because they are so small, they have greater access to the human body than larger particles.

They can be inhaled, penetrate skin, gain access to tissues and cells, and cross the blood-brain barrier. Assessing the risks of nanotechnology is lagging far behind development of applications.  “There is virtually no data on chronic, long-term effects on people, other organisms or the wider environment,” wrote  British scientist John Lawton, author of a report from the Royal Commission on Environment Pollution.

Sunscreens are the most widely used consumer product containing nanoparticles.  Tests on mice in the US have shown that sunscreen nanoparticles over-stimulated brain cells, which could lead to brain damage over time. Studies at the University of Toledo, Utah State University  and the University of Utah found that nano particles, including nanotitanium dioxide, found in sunscreens killed beneficial bacteria and soil microbes. So these are yet more reasons why sunscreens are bad for your health. Why do they make nanoparticle-sized sunscreens? Because the tiny size also means that the product/color is not visible on the skin – and people don’t want white stripes of zinc on their nose or body.

Articles of clothing (commonly socks and underwear) contain nanosilver particles marketed as “bacterial guards”. Unfortunately, these nanoparticles wash out in your laundry and are carried into our groundwater where they are changing the ecology of lakes and rivers by killing bacteria and algae. As you can well imagine, mucking with an ecosystem in this way is not likely to be a good idea.

Some initial studies raise red flags. A recent study published in Nature showed that carbon nanotubes may exhibit the same cancer-causing potential as asbestos. Keep in mind though, that nanoparticles don’t just exist through scientific manipulation, they have also been around a long time as the pollutants given off by cars and trucks. The president of the National Institute of Ecology (INE) in Mexico City, Adrian Fernandez says:

“Ultrafine nanoparticles are the most hazardous because they penetrate and lodge themselves in the deepest part of the respiratory system also accessing the cardiovascular system. They are generated by vehicular combustion processes, particularly of buses with diesel engines”.

In tests on rats, nanosilver has also been shown to be toxic to liver, brain and stem cells and may harm beneficial bacteria.

The Positive Side of Nanotechnology

However, there are also dozens more tests that show nanosilver kills pathogens like HIV, herpes, and other viruses which are very difficult to eradicate – so there is also a positive side to the application of the same technology.

And although nanoparticles have been present in vehicle exhaust fumes for decades, they have also been present in plants which we have been consuming for thousands of years. Plants absorb mineral ions from the soil and convert them to nanoparticle-sized minerals within their roots and stems – which we automatically absorb when we eat the plants. Keep in mind that an ion is an atom or group of atoms. And an atom is one third the size of a nanometer. Scientists have even realized that this natural conversion ability of plants may be a better way to produce nanoparticle-sized metals for industrial use, then chemical processes which produce pollutants.

Nanoparticles were also used by artisans as far back as the 9th century in Mesopotamia for generating a glittering effect on the surface of pots.

My Conclusion

So, when I looked at the fact that plants naturally produce nanoparticle-sized minerals, thus indicating that our bodies have been safely absorbing minerals in this form for millenia, that gave me a base of confidence to try nanoparticle and angstrom-sized minerals.

As well, I looked at people/groups who have been consuming nanoparticle minerals for years already – athletes and children with autism. Jim Haszinger, the president of the company we get our nano minerals from, gave me a list of autism clinics in the U.S. who have been using his minerals for 2 – 6 years already. Jim and his family have been consuming his nanoparticle minerals for over 20 years. A good friend of Dr. Carolyn Dean MD ND – veterinarian Terry Wood – has been using nanoparticle minerals and electrolyte blends with animals and athletes for over 5 years. There were no accounts of adverse effects from using nanoparticle minerals from any of these groups.

I also found a number of studies showing clear benefits to nanoparticle or angstrom-sized mineral supplementation for osteoporosis and tooth decay. I go into my research in a lot more detail at LTYG Wellness Circle and we’re also going to be doing a teleseminar on nanoparticle minerals soon.

Lastly, I sat with all my research and “head knowledge” for few months and then plugged in to see what my gut said. Based on my intuition, I started taking Bone Support nanoparticle minerals (a blend of minerals that support bone and tooth formation and strengthening), Miracle of Life Trace Minerals (these are all the trace minerals, many of which have disappeared from our soil since the advent of pesticides and monoculture crops in the 1930’s) and Angstrom Iron. After taking them myself for numerous months, I started my kids on them too – and ALL our tooth decay disappeared:

In my family, we take one capful of the Minerals of Life – Trace Minerals in the morning (kids take 1/2 capful) – we just tip it into our mouths and swallow it straight. At night, we take our Bone Support minerals last thing before bed so they will stop decay by re-mineralizing our teeth and also shifting the pH of our mouths to an alkaline state (it is often the acidic pH in the mouth that causes tooth decay). We take 1 capful for adults, 1/2 capful for the kids. After brushing and flossing, we hold and swish the Bone Support around our teeth for about 2 minutes, then swallow. Both the kids and I have noticed that using these minerals to induce alkalinity right before bed also helps ensure a deep, uninterrupted sleep.

If you are suffering from, or concerned about osteoporosis, then you will likely need to take more of the Bone Support for a period of time. You might want to take 1 tbsp, 2-3x/day for 3 months, then get re-tested. Also, you may want to take 1 tbsp. of the Minerals of Life Trace Minerals each day. And don’t forget your daily Vitamin D – also crucial for bone formation.

The nanoparticle iron is especially exciting for people with gut disorders, since normal iron is quite irritating to the gut and can trigger intestinal bleeding and result in constipation. This lead to quite a multi-step process in Listen To Your Gut for taking iron in order to boost absorption and guard against adverse effects. All of that becomes unnecessary with angstrom or nanoparticle-sized iron since it does not require digestion and therefore does not irritate the GI tract. I even tested it by taking 8x and then 16x the dose on one day – as I was concerned by research on nanoparticle ferric oxide in mouse models – but there were no adverse effects.

I used this iron myself to raise both my hemoglobin and my ferritin (iron stores), taking 1 tablespoon once or twice per day. It works really fast and there are no intestinal effects as it does not require digestion. For this reason, it should be safe to use whilst bleeding – but go slowly and test it to be sure. The iron particles are angstrom-sized = .10 nm, very tiny nanoparticles, which are absorbed instantly into the blood and cells.

If treating anemia, ideally, you should take 1 tsp in the morning and 1 tsp in the evening. For severe anemia (hemoglobin less than 7 or 70) , I would take 1 tsp, 3 – 4 times per day. I always washed it down with lots of water or other liquid (just my intuition). It tastes only faintly of iron, but mostly just like metallic water. If you are using it for maintenance, then I would think 1 tsp every other day (or just twice a week) should be sufficient. You can get your hemoglobin tested (to track your progress) within 30 – 45 days since this product builds hemoglobin so fast. For best results, make sure you are also getting adequate B12 and folic acid – co-factors needed to utilize iron properly.

I also began experimenting with new anti-pathogen formulas using nanosilver, tea tree, wild oregano oil and DMSO and have had amazing results treating fungal, viral and bacterial skin infections among my family, friends and neighbours (also published at LTYG Wellness Circle).

Whilst I feel good about taking nanosized targeted minerals from a trusted supplier, I do NOT feel good about being unwittingly exposed to all kinds of nanoparticles in food, clothing, packaging materials, etc. – as outlined above. We definitely need (as is the case with EMR – electromagnetic radiation) a non industry-influenced regulatory body to test and research these new technologies before they are unleashed en masse on all of us, without our knowledge or consent.

I’m not going to advise you on what you should do with your body, since this is a new technology. But I wanted to share my experience and research (as I said, lots more in-depth research results at JPT Wellness Circle). As it stands now, these nanoparticle minerals are the best thing for myself and my kids – since we had previously tried everything to cure our tooth decay, with no success.

soar higher,
Jini

____________________________________________________

Jini Patel Thompson’s books on natural healing for digestive diseases have sold in over 40 different countries. Her health articles have been published in journals and magazines in the U.S., Australia and U.K. www.ListenToYourGut.com

Nanoparticle & Angstrom Minerals
19 Comments

19 thoughts on “Nanoparticle & Angstrom Minerals

  • As always – plenty of food for thought here. Environment and Health Canada have relatively recently started research on the eco-toxicology that may be a consequence of the plethora of nanoparticles that have now infiltrated our consumables. Dr. Barry Glickman from the University of Victoria (http://cbr.uvic.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=79) would be a great person to discuss this new angle for the treatment of human diseases.
    Stay well and prosper.

  • Hello Jini, wonderful informative website that you have here 🙂 I am based in the UK and can buy the bone support mini minerals (http://kylevialli.com/shop/) though not the MM minerals of life. I am looking to treat tooth sensitivity & decay. After a lifetime of healthy teeth, circa 2010 (age 39) I started with dental problems that coincided with rapid weight loss. My then Dr & tests could not get to bottom of the reason for this, although I did suspect it may have had something to do with my hiatal hernia (I also suspect night time reflux was affecting my teeth with acid whilst sleeping. Due to the anxiety caused in dealing with all this including requiring a huge molar root canal & another filling on a further broken molar and dealing with other work related & personal problems I also started with jaw clamping during sleep and have worn away the top surface of my bottom incisors with surface cracks in the enamel both top & bottom appearing. I have recently been diagnosed with chronic kidney disease, stage 2/3 and have read that those with CKD often have dental problems as well:-( Do you know if the bone support MM will be beneficial for my teeth and health without the accompanying minerals of life and if safe to take as an early stage CKD patient (i am not on any medication as yet for the CKD unless a bladder/kidney infection occurs and antibiotics prescribed, I do take a d-mannose supplement as a preventative) In your video in the comments section you mention mi paste, I have also used this before (the non fluoride version), which type do you use currently and which toothpaste would you recommend or say that you have had the most positive results from? I have a healthy diet, avoid most grain products and processed high carbs (they continue to swell in the stomach and irritate the hernia pushing it further into the chest cavity), I do homemade stock(bonebroths)etc and i’m now at a loss to what else I can do to protect my teeth. Our UK dentists both private & NHS are stuck in a rut regarding root canals, mercury amalgam & fluoride and our NHS Dr’s seem totally in the control of Big Pharma…very frustrating. So any advice you can offer regarding a dental protocol that has worked for you and and your family would be greatly appreciated. Best wishes to you from Sarah, UK x:-)

  • Hi. Where can I find papers about the similar nature of these nanoparticle minerals and the colloid-form minerals of plants? Thanks a lot. D.

  • Thanks. But I dont know if I explain myself the right way. I mean: where can I find some papers which explains this statement of yours:

    “And although nanoparticles have been present in vehicle exhaust fumes for decades, they have also been present in plants which we have been consuming for thousands of years. Plants absorb minerals from their soil and convert them to nanoparticle-sized minerals within their roots and stems – which we automatically absorb when we eat the plants”.

    Just because I would like to have more information about it. It could persuade me to try, for example, something like Remag. I already try google (with not much success) but I wonder if you can help me to find something to read. Thank you.

  • Here’s a good one:

    http://www.preservearticles.com/201101042461/plants-absorb-water-and-minerals-from-soil.html

    Keep in mind that an ion is an atom, or group of atoms. And one atom is a third of a nanometer in size.

    Also, did you check the reference I already gave? As this one states: “the alfalfa extracts gold from the medium and stores it in the form of nanoparticles”

    http://news.stanford.edu/pr/02/alfalfa821.html

    Actually I will edit the blog post to include this info, in case others want to investigate further.

  • Now was just in a big discussion about this with somebody he claims nano particles are ruining health and in dental it caught my attention cause every time I get Dental work done my health declines . I had a missing front tooth and had a bridge in for yrs then removing it my health slowly came back only to decline after puting a different type of bridge I now wear the bridge only sparingly out in public

    Anyway the Dentist also put bonding on my left front tooth since then I have left kidney pain and edema only now to realize in biological dentistry the left front tooth is connected to the left kidney meridian . I honestly feeel the metal oxides atrract all this wireless junk we got in the world and that causes problems in that meridian I am now trying to remove that bonding

    He claims its thye nano particles which I then thought well what about angstrom minerals aren’t they good for us he claims no all nano is bad for your health thats were I got to step off and think yes if its a chemical in nano particle form its bad but a mineral or natural substance would be good

    See the Dentist had claimed that the bridge’s metal;s were like chromium and boron which is minerals what we eat so its good for the body but I say thats a crock the bridge is an inorganic material I’m not going to eat it , the magnesium or chromium in food is organic and its supposed to be in the body and coinsumed and my thought is if its an organic type of mineral and angstrom minerals being that it is good but as I said an inorganic made or chemical nano particle is bad

    I” d like your input here , as he had me confused on maybe not taking angstrom minerals

    Thanks Derek

  • By the way the wireless or electro radiation there is no lmits the FCC is totally asleep at the wheel here to be polite. We are now being bombed 24/7 by wireless radiation this I seem to be effected by coinvcidently more since dental work which the nano particles could be contributed too. But basically the FCC says if it doesn’t heat the skin or basically cook you its within limits . USA cell towers arer 100x stronger then European cell towers. Pollution was a big concern we are 4x the amount of pollution as we had in tye 50s yet nobody balks that we are over a million fold in just the last 10 yrs of wireless radiation . This is the biggest health threat to us now

  • Hi Derek, the problem is that (1) we just don’t know enough and (2) different bodies have differing levels of sensitivity. I’ll give you an example: I had a gold crown and my body kept saying to me, “Take it off”. Having paid almost $2000 for the crown and nothing was wrong that I could discern, I put it off for a while, but the message kept coming. Finally I went into my dentist and told him the truth – because there was no reason I should be asking to have it removed, nothing appeared wrong! I said, “My body wants it removed. I have no idea why.” So he took it off and there was decay underneath the crown, the gum was inflamed and the tooth itself was severely inflamed. My body/teeth don’t like gold! My husband has 1 gold filling and 1 gold crown and just had another gold crown put on. His body is just fine with them. I replaced that cold crown with a porcelain Cerec crown and my tooth is now happy.

    So regardless of what the research says – which changes all the time – just listen to your own body and you’ll do just fine.

    Regarding the WiFi radiation – I have blogged extensively on this – just type “WiFi Radiation” into the search box on my blog here and it will pull up my posts for you. And got a new one coming out on Wednesday about the newest FCC 5G Rollout fiasco!

  • After reading your article, I want to start taking the Bone Support and Minerals of Life to help my sensitive teeth and bones. You mentioned in your comments for Bone Support that you also take the Mini-Minerals Magnesium. Why would you still need to take the MM Magnesium if you’re taking the minerals of life that contain magnesium? I am trying to decide if I need to purchase all three products or if the bone support and minerals of life are sufficient. Periodically, I get leg cramps, but it usually is when I haven’t had enough water and/or my diet is lacking something. Also, do you and your family see a conventional dentist or a biological/holistic dentist? I’m starting to learn about biological/holistic dentists and would like to know your thoughts on them. Please advise.

    1. Hello Eva,

      Thank you for the inquiry. Some people are in need of the extra magnesium, more so than what is in the Minerals of Life, which Jini personally was. However, if you feel you are not than the Bone Support and Minerals of Life may be good enough for you. Jini recommends trying to listen to your gut on what supplements your body is in need of. You can see more information about the nano-sized magnesium here: http://blog.listentoyourgut.com/transdermal-and-nano-sized-magnesium/
      Jini and her family personally sees a holistic dentist.
      Please let us know if we can help with anything else.

      Kind Regards,
      Rachel
      Customer Care

  • Hi Jini, you have helped me so much in the past with ulcerative colitis and strictures, I thank you so much. I was wondering if you had any suggestions or solutions to wean off prednisone. Because of all the past flair ups I have been on prednisone for too long and get terrible back pains when trying to wean off. I would love to know what you know about this..I have tried everything.

    1. Hello Robie,

      Glad to hear Jini’s protocols have helped you so much. Sorry you have started to not feel well again. Jini’s best advice and schedule for weaning off medications can be found starting on page 306 of the Listen to Your Gut book that can be found here: http://listentoyourgut.com/healing-resources/6/listen-to-your-gut-the-complete-natural-healing-program-for-ibs-and-ibd.html
      Hope you are able to feel better soon. If there is anything else we can help you with please let us know.

      Kind Regards,
      Rachel
      Customer Care

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php