An important point to keep in mind, is that as pharmaceutical company revenues continue to fall and public buying practices continue to reflect a growing interest in natural or alternative healthcare, we are going to see a LOT more publicity/propoganda attacking natural herbs and substances.

It reminds me of Comfrey. Comfrey is the most amazing wound healer I have ever come across. But the FDA (funded and driven by big Pharma) actually banned it – based on ONE death by a woman who was in very bad health, taking dozens of drugs, and oh yes, she also drank an excessive amount of comfrey tea every day. Compare this with 7,000 deaths in the same year from Aspirin (which surprise, surprise is still on the shelves) and you get the message.

So basically, don’t believe anything you read/hear in the mainstream media – it is completely unreliable. You can get questions from there, but then do your own research before forming an opinion or actioning anything.

Here’s the latest in a no-doubt Pharma-funded “study”, along with an full explanation of the bigger picture:

By: Andrew W. Saul, Ph.D.

“Can a vitamin kill you?” asks the Montreal Gazette.

According to Evra Taylor Levy and Eddy Lang’s article (May 12, 2008), vitamins are murderous little molecules. “Stop taking supplements of vitamins A, E and beta-carotene, plain and simple,” they say. Quoting an interpretation of data by researchers with the Cochrane collaboration (1), they would have you believe that vitamins are somehow harmful, and quite possibly deadly.

So where are the bodies? The authors’ single, much quoted, much-touted “study” was merely a meta-analysis. A meta-analysis is not a clinical study, but rather a statistical look at a collection of studies. The key to “convenient” statistics is exactly which studies you choose to look at . . . or refuse to look at. If you analyze enough failed studies, you will get a negative meta-analysis. It’s a no-brainer. If you exclude enough successful studies, you preordain the conclusion. When you select a mere 67 studies, out of thousands and thousands of existing, positive vitamin supplements studies, something is wrong. Yet that is exactly what the Cochrane review did.

A very large amount of research showing that vitamins are safe and effective was systematically excluded. For example, the study authors never even looked at over 600 scientific studies and papers from the Toronto-based Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, a peer-reviewed medical journal that specifically publishes vitamin therapy research, and has done so for over forty years. They also failed to consider the wealth of reports by experienced doctors, such as distinguished Vancouver physician Abram Hoffer, MD. Dr. Hoffer, who also has a PhD in nutritional biochemistry, said, “Vitamin supplements are extraordinarily safe and effective. This is based on fifty years of clinical experience without seeing any life-threatening side effects and no deaths. It is pharmaceutical drugs that are dangerous. Perhaps the drug industry is getting tired of all the bad news about drugs, so instead they are going after nutritional supplements.”

Another British Columbia physician, Erik Paterson, MD, said: “For 33 years I have aggressively prescribed and advocated vitamins in doses vastly higher than the usual government recommendations for my family and my patients. I have never seen any adverse reactions, even though I have been on the alert for them all this time.”

71% of Canadians use natural health products. If they are so dangerous, where are all the bodies? Perhaps there aren’t any simply because vitamin supplements are indeed safe. Health Canada, under the 2004 Natural Health Products Regulations (4), requires that vitamins and other supplements “must be safe for consideration as over-the-counter products. . . Health Canada ensures that all Canadians have ready access to natural health products that are safe, effective and of high quality.” (2)

A 23-year review of US poison control center annual reports (3) confirms the true and largely ignored story: vitamins are extraordinarily safe. The American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC), which maintains the USA’s national database of information from 61 poison control centers, provides data showing that even including intentional and accidental misuse, the number of alleged vitamin fatalities is strikingly low, averaging less than one death per year for more than two decades. In 16 of those 23 years, AAPCC reports that there was not one single death due to vitamins. (3) These statistics specifically include vitamin A, niacin (B-3), pyridoxine (B-6), other B-complex, C, D, E, and “other” vitamin(s), such as vitamin K. Michael Janson, MD, said, “In decades of people taking a wide variety of dietary supplements, few adverse effects have been noted, and zero deaths as a result of the dietary supplements. There is far more risk to public health from people sto! pping their vitamin supplements than from people taking them.”

Supplements are an easy, practical entry-level better-nutrition solution for the public, who are more likely to take convenient vitamin tablets than to willingly eat organ meats, wheat germ, and ample vegetables. Scare-stories notwithstanding, taking supplements is not the problem; it is a solution. Malnutrition is the problem.

It is indeed curious that, while theorizing many “potential” dangers of vitamins, critics fail to point out how economical supplements are. The uncomfortable truth is that it is often less expensive to supplement than to buy nutritious food, especially out-of-season fresh produce. For low-income households, taking vitamin supplements, readily obtainable from any discount store, is vastly cheaper than getting those vitamins by eating right.

The Gazette should know better. Public s