I am so delighted to be able to share this “hot off the presses” information with you.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini, an oncologist in Rome, has discovered a cure for cancer that works 90% of the time with tumors that are under 3 cm and it is so simple, it’s beautiful. It essentially involves treating the tumor or cancerous area with… baking soda!

Why does this treatment work? Because Dr. Simoncini maintains that cancer is a fungus. Therefore, just as millions of women who treat their Candida infections with baking soda have discovered, fungus does not do well with baking soda!

The 10% failure rate is due to bone cancers – they have been unable to come up with a way to get the baking soda inside the bone.

Dr. Simoncini explains this in person, on Doug Kaufmann’s TV show (p.s. I’ve been on Doug’s show twice and he has been educating people about fungus for a decade or longer):

Cancer Is A Fungus – Part 1

Cancer Is A Fungus – Part 2

You can also visit this site below and listen to a radio interview where Dr. John Apsley explains the baking soda treatment in detail and gives you the exact formula and delivery methods for different cancers. You can then take these formulations and instructions to your integrative medicine doctor and begin treatment if needed.

http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/rsbell-dr-apsley.html

Also important to note, Dr. Simonicini himself warns about a number of instances where the sodium bicarbonate treatment will not be effective, or have reduced impact:

[This information is all taken from Simoncini’s website]

1. The sodium bicarbonate has to be directly in contact with the tumour. Simply using it to induce alkalinity will not have a beneficial effect:

“In order to achieve the most detrimental effect on the tumours, the sodium bicarbonate  must be put in direct contact with the damaged tissue. It is also possible to put specific catheters (port-a-cath) in the arteries that run to the different conventional endoscope methods. Furthermore there can be used clysters, drip infusions, irrigations and infiltrations at the places where the tumour has grown.”

2.  For example, in the case of breast cancer, you need to use a specific application method and combination of treatments (injection and intravenous):

“Usually local perfusions with sodium bicarbonate are effective in breast cancer. If the size of the lump is less than 3 cm, it can completely shrink after a cycle of 6 injections. The treatment has to be repeated if the lumps are bigger 4-5 cm. After the local treatment it is necessary the intravenously administration of 500 ml 5% sodium bicarbonate, 6 days on 6 days off for 4 cycles.”

3. He is against radiation therapy, except in instances of bone or lymph tumors:

“My experience has taught me that radiotherapy, whether it is used as the first treatment option, or later in the progression of the disease, very rarely brings positive lasting results. This is with the exception of some tumors – for example, in bones or lymph nodes – that can actually benefit from this treatment. In these cases, especially when there is circumscribed localization in bones, radiotherapy always turns out to be a useful and fast weapon when associated with the simultaneous administration of bicarbonates and drugs that protect bony tissue.”

4. In some cases, Dr. Simoncini does in fact recommend surgery, with infusions of sodium bicarbonate administered before and after the surgery:

“Although in a limited way, surgery can in some cases be very useful, especially where the dimensions of a tumor do not ensure a sufficient perfusion of saline solutions. This is the case, for example, of intestinal neoplasias that are difficult to reach with endoscopic catheters. It is the case for all testicular tumors, themselves resectable before metastatization occurs because of their position which is located at the extreme end of the anatomical vascular and spermatic structures. Possible auto transplants with marrow “washed” in bicarbonate, tumors of excessive dimensions requiring a drastic preliminary reduction of their mass (peritoneal, pleural, skin tumors and others) can also need surgical intervention. In all cases it is wise to highlight the need always to administer sodium bicarbonate solutions, before and after the operation, as they prevent new germinations of fungi and thus the formation of metastases. I am convinced, for example, that a resection intestinal intervention for neoplasia combined with infusions of sodium bicarbonate would succeed in almost all cases, as local or remote relapses could not occur.”

5. He recommends iodine rather than sodium bicarbonate to treat skin tumors.

6. Regarding Kahler’s Disease, he says:

“Sodium Bicarbonate is not effective in the thoracic localizations of a leukosis (Kahler’s disease). Local infiltrations can be performed in case of strong pain.”

7. Regarding Leukemia he says:

“Leukaemia is not always due to a fungine infection, so that’s why it is difficult to cure it.
Moreover leukaemia can be a reaction to a fungine mass, whose localisation is unknown.”

8. And finally, regarding the overall efficacy of the sodium bicarbonate treatment, Dr. Simoncini qualifies that:

“If the fungus are sensible to the sodium bicarbonate solutions and the tumour is smaller  than 3 cm, the percentage will be around the 90% , for terminal cases in which the patients is in reasonable good conditions is 50% and for terminals patients just a small percentage.”

Not surprisingly, Dr. Simoncini has since lost his medical license (he is currently in litigation to get it back), but regardless, there are dozens of clinics and hospitals in Rome and North of Rome who are continuing to implement his protocols. Keep an eye out as it won’t be long before Cancer Institutes, the FDA, Big Pharma and numerous others who make billions out of cancer treatment, or the “search for the cure” for cancer release “studies” discrediting his protocols. Unfortunately, a quick look at the past shows this happens with every natural remedy or protocol that is very effective. We just need to stay savvy and not be swayed by the propaganda when it comes down the pipe.

As those of you who have done any research on this topic know, there are actually numerous natural treatment protocols that are highly effective at curing cancer. However, this one is definitely worth incorporating into treatment, because not only is it so simple, it is very quick too.

Here’s some more information on this treatment, plus a discussion of why chemotherapy is not effective and 75% of doctors said they would not undergo chemo if diagnosed with cancer.

Of course, as with healing any disease, you must then make the lifestyle, environmental and dietary changes necessary to prevent future fungal infection, if you want to remain cancer-free for the rest of your life. But then, this applies to all of us anyway.

Jini

Natural Cancer Treatment Has 90% Success Rate
17 Comments

17 thoughts on “Natural Cancer Treatment Has 90% Success Rate

  • Cancer is a fungus!! Look at the similarities between cancer and candida. Cancer is the long term effect of candida. And like all modern disease such as hiv and so on are caused by the medical world. And The damage being done to our basic foods before we eat them. Any cell that is deprived of 60% of oxygen turns cancerous. . Candida breeds in low oxygen so does cancer . A cleaver doctor will know all disease is from candida or parasites and our shocking acidic western diet. Nature knows best and we should learn how to use it to our advantage.

  • Hi Beatis – thanks for providing that link. Further discussion and investigation is always good. However, we also need to be transparent about our biases. I feel a quick scan of my blog topics or site content shows I’m pretty biased in favor of natural treatments for diseases.

    I’m glad too that you’re up-front about your bias in the ABOUT section of your blog:

    “The main purpose of this blog is to warn people against alternative medicine, alternative cancer treatments in particular. By alternative cancer treatments we mean treatments that are used instead of standard cancer therapy and of which there is no reliable indication of their efficacy.”

    A couple of things jumped out at me after reading your blog postings on Simoncini (keeping in mind that I know very little about cancer and am just a layperson, so very willing to be corrected by those who are immersed in applicable research):

    – I don’t believe using sodium bicarbonate orally to change the pH of urine was ever suggested by Simoncini as an effective therapy for bladder cancer. From what I’ve read, he’s pretty insistent that one must use a variety of methods of application to get the baking soda itself in direct contact with the affected tissue.

    – if you go to one of Simoncini’s sites, he himself lists a number of different cases where the baking soda treatment will not be effective (I’ll compile a summary of these and add them to my blog post above as an udate):
    http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/cancer-therapy-faq.html

    – those of us who have been involved with researching ANY medical/body/health issue know that we can come up with any number of scientific papers that say YES to any given proposition and the same number that say NO. Obviously I’m oversimplifiying here to make a point, but, have you ever researched the “other side of the coin” with the same tenacity, passion and doggedness as the side that you want to put forth? I have.

    Perhaps the fellow who calls himself “Wewee” on your blog should give this a try and set himself the task of finding 5 studies in medical publications that support the use and efficacy of sodium bicarbonate in cancer treatment and see what he comes up with. But again, it has to be done in the full spirit and passion of his anti-sodium bicarb expose, or he won’t come up with the goods.

    And that’s why, unscientific though it may be, the crowning determinant in my books is – theory aside, does it work? And in order to assess that question, you need to have people who are committed to testing the protocol in its entirety, as originally laid out by the person who got good results from it, and then refine it as necessary to achieve the highest possible success.

    Also, and again, here’s the bias of my own personal experience and my reader’s feedback: For any complex or systemic disease, there is very rarely going to be just ONE treatment that “cures” it. These conditions have many components and one must adopt a wholistic approach in order to heal the numerous roots of causation that are feeding into the disease expression.

    So, rather than just looking at research trial publications, I also like to do a lot of talking to practitioners who are actually working with these diseases and the people who are actually trying these protocols.

    We can feel as triumphant and secure as we like within the walls of our cosy scientific paradigms. But at the end of the day– are you healed? Are you healthy, vibrant, strong and energetic? That’s the litmus test.

    Oh, and one more thing it’s important to keep in mind. Simoncini himself is not saying to patients – “Just do this sodium bicarbonate treatment or you’re doomed!” Here is his answer to a patient questioning:

    What do I have to say to my internist to convince him that I want to follow the bicarbonate therapy?

    “The therapy can be done before and/or after a chemo or radiation treatment. Ask him to let you follow the therapy with the Sodium Bicarbonate according to the Dr.Simoncini protocol, depending on the type of cancer, location, size etc tec. The therapy will approximately take 8 weeks. After this period an examination should be performed. Cat scan, MRI, echo etc. The results will be either supporting the therapy or not. This therapy is totally safe and cheap and can be followed also as a supplementary therapy. If the doctor will not go along with your request than ask him to respect the will of the suffering patient.”

    So anyway, glad you’re going into the other realm of possibilities here. Questioning, searching and experimenting is always good. I appreciate your contribution!

  • @ JINI,

    Trust me, we have tried to find research proving baking soda is effective against cancer, but there isn’t any, that’s the problem.

    You say:

    “I don’t believe using sodium bicarbonate orally to change the pH of urine was ever suggested by Simoncini as an effective therapy for bladder cancer. From what I’ve read, he’s pretty insistent that one must use a variety of methods of application to get the baking soda itself in direct contact with the affected tissue.”

    Simoncini claims that cancer is a fungus – candida albicans – caused in its turn by our body’s ph being compromised. But there is no evidence whatsoever that cancer is s fungus. There is no evidence that changing our body ph causes fungus. There is no evidence that locally changing our body ph – as Simoncini does when he infuses the tumour with sodium bicarbonate – will destroy the fungus/cancer. (How one can destroy something which isn’t there in the fist place is beyond me in the first place, but never mind that now.) And last but not least: there is no evidence whatsoever that baking soda is effective against systemic fungal infections. We have effective drugs against systemic fungal infections and baking soda is just not one of them.

    One of our blog members is jli. He is a pathologist/scientist who deals with cancer on a daily basis. Not once in his career has he seen that cancer is a fungus. And he is not the only one.

    I think it is sad and deplorable that Simoncini has not been able to deliver one shred of evidence for his theory. He should have done so, making the claims that he does. I also think it is very disrespectful towards cancer patients to make statements – promises – like these while not being able to back them up in any way. And now science is blamed for not being able to prove his theory – he should have done it himself. This would not have to be very expensive, since baking soda is cheap and can easily be bought in vast quantities for little money. Why didn’t he do this?

    I also think it very problematic that he actively advises against surgery. Surgery is the primary treatment for all solid cancers. Telling patients not to have their cancer removed but have infusions with sodium bicarbonate instead is unbelievably irresponsible in my opinion.

    You say baking soda is cheap. It is. But Simoncini’s treatment is not. Now, how can that be?

    I appreciate your quest for natural therapies. Please bear in mind however that nature itself produces the most lethal toxins imaginable, which have been the basis for effective and life- saving drugs for years. I’ll mention just a few:
    Arsenic
    Amygdalin
    Digoxin
    Strychnine
    Cocaine
    Curare
    Cicutoxin
    Morphine
    Ricin

    ‘Natural’ does not by definition equal ‘harmless’.

  • This test is just absolute compilation of idiocy, alchemy and lies. Do u ever view anything critically that comes out of these gurus’ mouths?

  • It is most interesting to read the “obnoxious” comments of the preferential drug addicts (refence, anyone who thinks only the big pharma drug pushers are correct).

    There are many simple, natural, successful remedies for hundreds of medical problems; which is exactly why big pharma wants them under their control – so you wouldn’t have access to them. UK parliament is currently trying to pass a bill to that effect (under pressure from big pharma) early 2011. For those who do prefer natural products, WATCH OUT, North America is next, including Canada!!!

    At least, the bi-carb. trearment of the digestive tract for cancer is HARMLESS !! So if it works, then it also suggests that more “difficult to reach” cancers would probably be treated successfully using the same simple bi carb. treatment. IT’s SAFE, So what do you havr to loose??

    IT ONLY MAKES (UN)COMMON SENSE!!!

  • Dear readers,
    it shocks me to see how people interfere with alternate treatment that makes sense to save3 lives of others who are desparate for a solution. as with many drugs, john Hopkins has finally confirmed that chemo and radiation are killing people.
    how many treatments and drugs get approved by FDA and then after killing many people they finally admit??
    let us not kid ourselves. chincona bark of certain trees cured malaria. chincona grows in same places where malaria exixts. then came the pharma industry and started to extract quinine from chincona bark and started selling as medicine, it was always available free prior to pharma co;s involvement.
    until 59;s 0 doctors used to make own medicine for the patient and it cured the disease. after 50;s things started to change and a major switch took place whereby doctors were no longer allpowed to make the medicine and a pharmacist was introduced. interestingly enough, pharmacist never saw the patient and the doctor was removed from dispensing medicine. then came FDA who employs beaurocrats and is told by politicians (LAW MAKERS). abt what to do. having separated the most important thing patient needed the most ie direct involvement by doctor and himseld to prescribe medicine, Pharma companies started dictating what medicines must be given to a patient, the pharmacist has no more involvement except count number of pills and fill the order of the doctor.
    the way it all stands now is – Pharma Companies lobbys politicians (curreptive practises, may as well call it LEGAL BRIBE) drugs get approved, doctors are TOLD what to prescribe and Pharmacvists are told what to dispense…….etc etc (dont forget how much is spent to entertain doctors to push pharma cos own drug……….on and on………
    why would one protect a system tyhat has been created to serew consumers?

    use some simple logic – here i9s a doctor who knows that cancer is a fungus that can be cured by a simple one dollar solution “sodium bicarbonate” – IT IS VERY SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND, NO DIFFERENT THAN WHEN FUNGUS GROWS IN SWIMMING POOL, WE DONOT THROW AWAY THE POOL WATER BUT WE INCREASE THE PH TO ALKJALINE. IN NO TIME IT CLEARS UP WITH ALL THE FUNGI DEAD, NWE START SWIMMIMG AGAIN IN THE SAME WATER. WHEN WE HV FUNGUS ON TOES WE DONOT GO FOR CHEMO BUT USE FUNGICIDE AND DEAL WITH IT.

    LET US NOT GET CAUGHT IN THYE BULL SHIT OF THOSE MONEY HUNGRY COMPANIES INVOLVED IN BILLIONS OF DOLLRS WORTH DRUGS THAT ARE NOT REALLY NEEDED BUT WE ARE FORCED TO BUY.
    MOST IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT DR SIMONISE OFFERS A SOLUTION FOR LESS THAN ONE DOLLAR AND THERE IS NO WAY HE IS MAKING ONE CENT OUT OF IT. JUST THINK;;;;;; ANYONE OBJECTING TO SODIUM BICARBONATE TREATMENT MUST CLERIFY THAT THAT HAVE NO CONFLICTNG INTERESTS.
    KUMDI

  • Marijuana The Forbidden Cure for Cancer.
    There are people out there being cured of even terminal cancer. You can make your own medicine and avoid radiation and chemo poisoning your body.
    The link below has a pretty good take on it with videos and even has a video how to make your cancer medicine and dosages to take. You can grow you own and make your own medicine.
    http://marijuanaplanet.us/The_Forbidden_Cure_For_Cancer.htm

  • You idiots that are saying that raising ph levels in cancer cells doesn’t kill cancer have no idea what you are talkin about cause there has been study’s that show that cancers cant survive ph levels of 8.0 but normal cells can. I’m not saying that cancer is a fungus but they are alike in that they can’t survive in high ph environments Its people like u that feed into the bid pharm and medical propaganda that is feed into us by big news that is in with big pharm and medical which are just protecting their profits and don’t give a crap about people cause there would already be cure to cancer if they actually tried but there are more profit to be made if you only go into remission so you got to keep coming back for more radiation and chemo treament and surgery when it comes back

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php